What is Attribution in social psychology | Kelly's theory of attribution | Covariance theory | Social Psychology 

Attribution in social psychology refers to the process of explaining the causes of behavior, events, and outcomes. It is the way we understand and interpret the actions of others, as well as our own actions. Attributions can be internal or external, depending on whether they are caused by factors within or outside of an individual's control. Attribution theory helps to explain how people make sense of the world around them, and how they form judgments and make decisions based on their understanding of causal relationships. 

There are two main types of attributions: dispositional and situational. Dispositional attributions involve explaining behavior as a result of a person's internal characteristics, such as personality traits or abilities. For example, if someone is consistently punctual, we might attribute this to their conscientiousness. Situational attributions, on the other hand, involve explaining behavior as a result of external circumstances, such as environmental factors or social pressure. For example, if someone is late to a meeting, we might attribute this to traffic or bad weather. 

There are several factors that influence the type of attribution we make. One of these is the consistency of behavior over time. If a person consistently exhibits a certain behavior, we are more likely to make a dispositional attribution. However, if their behavior varies depending on the situation, we are more likely to make a situational attribution. Another factor is the distinctiveness of the behavior. If a behavior is unique to a particular situation, we are more likely to make a situational attribution.

However, if the behavior is consistent across different situations, we are more likely to make a dispositional attribution. Attribution theory also includes the concept of the fundamental attribution error, which refers to the tendency to overemphasize dispositional attributions and underemphasize situational attributions. This can lead us to make inaccurate judgments about people's behavior, particularly in situations where we have limited information or are under time pressure. For example, if someone cuts us off in traffic, we might assume they are a bad driver (dispositional attribution) rather than considering that they might be in a hurry or have limited visibility (situational attribution). 

In addition to the fundamental attribution error, there are several other biases that can influence attributions. The actor-observer bias refers to the tendency to make dispositional attributions for other people's behavior and situational attributions for our own behavior. The self-serving bias refers to the tendency to make dispositional attributions for our successes and situational attributions for our failures. These biases can impact how we interpret and respond to events in our lives, and can have implications for our relationships and decision-making processes. 

Overall, attribution theory helps us to understand how people make sense of the world around them and the factors that influence their judgments and decisions. By being aware of these biases and factors, we can strive to make more accurate and fair attributions, and avoid making hasty or incorrect judgments about others. 

Kelly's theory of attribution | Covariance theory

Kelly's theory of attribution, also known as the covariation model, is a social psychological theory that explains how people make attributions about the causes of behavior. Kelly's theory focuses on three key factors that people use to make attributions: consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus. 

Consistency refers to whether the behavior is consistent over time. If someone consistently exhibits a particular behavior, we are more likely to attribute the behavior to their internal characteristics, such as their personality or attitudes. For example, if someone is always punctual, we might attribute this behavior to their conscientiousness. However, if the behavior is inconsistent, we are more likely to attribute it to external factors, such as the situation or circumstances. For example, if someone is usually punctual but is late for a meeting, we might attribute this behavior to external factors, such as traffic or an emergency. 

Distinctiveness refers to whether the behavior is unique to a particular situation or whether it occurs across different situations. If the behavior is unique to a particular situation, we are more likely to attribute it to external factors, such as the situation or circumstances. For example, if someone is only late to meetings that are held in a certain location, we might attribute their lateness to the location rather than to their personality or attitudes. However, if the behavior occurs across different situations, we are more likely to attribute it to internal characteristics, such as personality or attitudes. 

Finally, consensus refers to whether other people behave in a similar way in the same situation. If other people behave similarly in the same situation, we are more likely to attribute the behavior to external factors, such as the situation or circumstances. For example, if everyone is late to a meeting due to traffic, we are more likely to attribute the lateness to traffic rather than to the individuals' personality or attitudes. However, if other people behave differently in the same situation, we are more likely to attribute the behavior to internal characteristics, such as personality or attitudes. 

Overall, Kelly's theory of attribution suggests that people use these three factors - consistency, distinctiveness, and consensus - to make attributions about the causes of behavior. By considering these factors, we can better understand why people behave in certain ways and make more accurate and fair judgments about others.

Read also: What is aggression in Social Psychology? | Personal and social determinants of aggression in social psychology in detail